Make.com Teams vs Enterprise Plans: When Should an Operations Team Actually Upgrade?
Affiliate Disclosure: We review products independently. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission or a compound recurring commission at zero extra cost to you. Read our editorial policy.
Updated: July 2026. All pricing verified against Make.com on July 09, 2026.
Quick Verdict: Make.com Teams vs Enterprise Plans
| Make.com Pro | Make.com Teams | Make.com Enterprise | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly (annual billing) | $16/mo | $29/mo | Custom (est. $200–500+/mo) |
| Base credits/month | 10,000 | 10,000 | Custom allocation |
| Extra credit packs | $11/10,000 (+25% markup) | $11/10,000 (+25% markup) | Negotiated |
| Overage protection | No (scenarios pause) | No (scenarios pause) | Yes (no surprise stops) |
| Team roles / permissions | No | Yes | Yes |
| Shared scenario templates | No | Yes | Yes |
| SSO / SAML | No | No | Yes |
| SCIM user provisioning | No | No | Yes |
| Audit logs | No | No | Yes |
| 24/7 support + SLA | No | No | Yes |
| Enterprise app integrations | No | No | Yes (Workday, ServiceNow, Coupa) |
| Custom functions | No | No | Yes |
| Value Engineering team access | No | No | Yes |
| Pricing URL | make.com/en/pricing | make.com/en/pricing | make.com/en/pricing |
TSA Verdict: The Make.com Teams vs Enterprise Plans decision is not a features debate — it is a governance and scale debate. Teams at $29/month buys collaboration access for multi-person scenario management. Make.com Enterprise buys compliance infrastructure, operational continuity guarantees, and access to enterprise app ecosystems unavailable on any self-serve tier. For most agencies under 15 people, Make.com Teams is the correct ceiling. Enterprise becomes justified when overage protection, SSO, or audit logs are operational requirements, not preferences.
The Make.com Teams vs Enterprise Plans upgrade question surfaces at two distinct moments in an ops team’s lifecycle: when the team head count grows past 3 active scenario builders, and when the organization hits a compliance or security review that reveals what Teams is missing. These are different triggers requiring different evaluation frameworks.
Make.com restructured its credit system in August 2025, replacing “operations” with “credits” as the billing unit. For standard module runs, the cost is identical. AI-related modules and code execution now consume credits at variable rates beyond the standard 1:1. This change did not alter the Teams vs Enterprise comparison, but it changed how every Make.com team should model their monthly usage before choosing any plan tier.
One critical fact missing from most Make.com Teams vs Enterprise comparisons: all three self-serve paid plans (Core, Pro, and Teams) share the same 10,000-credit base allocation. Moving from Pro to Teams does not increase credits. Moving from Teams to Enterprise does not have a published credit allocation. The upgrade from Teams to Make.com Enterprise is entirely about governance, reliability, and ecosystem access. Not capacity.
What Make.com Teams Actually Adds Over Pro
The jump from Make.com Pro at $16/month to Teams at $29/month is 81% in price. The operational additions are narrow:
Team roles and permissions. Teams introduces role-based access: Admins, Members, and Operators. Admins control billing and organization settings. Members build and edit scenarios. Operators can trigger scenarios and view execution history but cannot edit logic. For agencies where a junior VA should be able to trigger a Zap equivalent but not modify workflow logic, this role separation prevents accidental scenario edits that break production workflows.
Shared scenario templates. Teams can publish scenarios as organization-wide templates, allowing other team members to deploy pre-built workflows without rebuilding from scratch per client or project. For agencies running similar automation setups across multiple clients, template libraries reduce per-client setup time meaningfully.
Team activity log. A shared log shows who edited which scenario and when. Not an audit log in the compliance sense — Make.com’s Teams activity log does not capture data payloads or provide the forensic-level trail that Enterprise’s audit log delivers. But for internal coordination, knowing that a colleague modified a scenario at 11pm explains why a morning automation behaved unexpectedly.
What Teams does not add: Credits. Priority execution (that is a Pro feature that carries into Teams). Overage protection. SSO. SCIM. Dedicated support. The collaboration layer is real. The infrastructure layer remains identical to Pro.
TSA SCAR: Make.com Teams Credit Overage — Scenarios Still Pause
Verified from Make.com documentation, July 2026.
Make.com Teams has the same credit overage behavior as Core and Pro: when monthly credits are exhausted, scenarios stop executing until the next billing cycle or until additional credit packs are purchased at $11 per 10,000 credits (with a 25% markup applied since November 2025). The auto-purchase feature allows Teams accounts to automatically buy 10,000-credit packs before exhaustion. This requires manual activation in account settings and still bills at the markup rate. Make.com Enterprise is the only plan with overage protection that keeps scenarios running without interruption or surprise charges. For agencies where automation downtime creates direct client-facing consequences, Teams does not resolve the continuity risk. Enterprise does. If overage behavior is the primary upgrade trigger, Teams is not the answer.
What Make.com Enterprise Actually Adds Over Teams
Make.com Enterprise pricing is custom and requires a sales conversation. Published market estimates range from $200 to $500+ per month depending on credit volume, user count, and contract terms. For an operations team evaluating Make.com Teams vs Enterprise Plans, the justification analysis starts with which of the following six additions your organization requires.
SSO and SCIM provisioning. SAML SSO lets your identity provider (Okta, Azure AD, OneLogin) authenticate Make.com access. Users log in via your existing SSO flow, not separate Make credentials. SCIM automates user lifecycle: when an employee joins, their Make.com access is provisioned automatically. When they leave, it is deprovisioned. For agencies managing sensitive client data through Make automations, a departed employee retaining Make.com access via their personal credentials is a genuine security exposure. Neither SSO nor SCIM is available below Enterprise.
Audit logs. Enterprise provides a detailed log of security and safety-related workspace activity: who accessed what, which scenarios were modified, when data was exported, which connections were created or deleted. The Teams activity log shows who edited a scenario. The Enterprise audit log shows what they accessed and changed at a data payload level. For agencies operating under data processing agreements with clients, audit logs provide the evidence trail that Teams cannot.
Overage protection. Enterprise is the only Make.com plan where scenarios continue executing when credit limits are reached, without pausing or requiring manual credit purchases. The credit consumption is reconciled at billing rather than triggering a hard stop. For operations teams running time-sensitive automations (client onboarding triggers, invoice sequences, SLA-driven notifications), the Enterprise overage model is an operational continuity guarantee.
Enterprise app integrations. Make.com Enterprise unlocks integrations unavailable on any self-serve plan: Workday (HR and finance modules), ServiceNow (IT workflow management), Coupa (procurement), Greenhouse (applicant tracking), and Infor M3 (ERP operations). For agencies building automations that touch clients’ enterprise systems — not consumer SaaS — these integrations are the only path to Make.com connectivity.
24/7 support with SLA and Value Engineering team. Teams plan support is email-based during business hours. Enterprise includes 24/7 support with a dedicated Technical Account Manager and access to Make’s Value Engineering team — architects who help design automation systems, not just resolve tickets. For large automation builds, this consulting access has compounding value across the implementation lifecycle.
Custom functions. Enterprise allows teams to define reusable custom transformation functions deployable across scenarios. For agencies with standardized data processing logic applied across multiple client workflows, custom functions eliminate redundant scenario rebuilding.
The Real Upgrade Decision: Three Triggers for Make.com Teams vs Enterprise
Trigger 1: The compliance audit.
A client or internal security review requires documented evidence of who accessed automation workflows and when. The Teams activity log does not satisfy this requirement. The Enterprise audit log does. This is a binary trigger. If the audit log is required for a contract, SOC 2 readiness, or data processing agreement, Make.com Enterprise is the only path.
Trigger 2: The headcount transition.
Make.com Teams was designed for 3–5 concurrent scenario builders. Beyond that, the per-seat economics of Teams relative to the governance features it provides start to compare unfavorably with alternatives. A 10-person automation team on Make.com Teams at $29/month has unlimited user access but no SCIM provisioning, no SSO, and no audit trail. At that team size, those missing governance features create operational security risks that the $13/month Teams-over-Pro premium did not resolve.
Trigger 3: Enterprise system integration.
If a client or internal system is Workday, ServiceNow, or another enterprise platform in Make’s Enterprise-only integration catalog, the conversation about Make.com Teams vs Enterprise Plans ends at the integration requirement. Teams cannot connect to these platforms. Enterprise does.
When neither upgrade is justified:
A solo operator or 2-person agency running 8 active scenarios at 30,000 credits per month has no operational use case for Teams’ collaboration layer. Pro at $16/month plus one extra credit pack at $11/month ($27/month total) covers the volume without paying for admin functionality that a 2-person team will never use. The Make.com Teams vs Enterprise Plans analysis is irrelevant until the team building scenarios expands beyond 2 people or a compliance requirement surfaces.
Cost Modeling: Make.com Teams vs Enterprise at Agency Scale
5-person agency, 25 active scenarios, 40,000 credits/month:
Make.com Teams base: $29/month (10,000 credits). Additional credit packs needed: 3 × $11 = $33. Total: $62/month ($744/year). No SSO, no audit log, no overage protection.
Make.com Enterprise: Custom. Market estimate at this scale: $200–250/month ($2,400–3,000/year). Includes SSO, audit log, overage protection, 24/7 support.
Gap: $1,656–2,256/year. Justified only if SSO or audit log compliance is a contractual requirement.
10-person agency, 60 active scenarios, 100,000 credits/month:
Make.com Teams: $29/month base + 9 credit packs × $11 = $128/month ($1,536/year). No governance layer.
Make.com Enterprise: Market estimate: $300–400/month ($3,600–4,800/year). Full governance layer.
Gap: $2,064–3,264/year. At this credit volume and team size, the Teams plan’s lack of overage protection becomes a monthly risk: any volume spike generates scenario pauses during active client workflows.
Feature Comparison: Make.com Teams vs Enterprise for Operations Teams
| Feature | Make.com Pro | Make.com Teams | Make.com Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-user scenario editing | No | Yes | Yes |
| Role-based access control | No | Yes (Admin/Member/Operator) | Yes (granular) |
| Shared scenario templates | No | Yes | Yes |
| Team activity log | No | Yes (basic) | Yes (forensic audit log) |
| SSO / SAML | No | No | Yes |
| SCIM provisioning | No | No | Yes |
| Overage protection | No | No | Yes |
| Priority execution | Yes | Yes | Yes (enhanced) |
| Enterprise app integrations | No | No | Yes |
| Custom functions | No | No | Yes |
| SLA-backed uptime | No | No | Yes |
| Value Engineering team | No | No | Yes |
| Base credits/month | 10,000 | 10,000 | Custom (negotiated) |
Buy / Skip Decision Matrix
| Scenario | Verdict |
|---|---|
| Solo or 2-person ops team, <30,000 credits/month | Make.com Pro ($16/mo) + credit packs |
| 3–5 people actively building and editing scenarios | Make.com Teams ($29/mo) |
| Agencies needing shared scenario template libraries | Make.com Teams |
| Credit volume requires 4+ packs/month on Teams | Evaluate Enterprise credit negotiation vs Teams + packs |
| Compliance audit requires documented workflow access logs | Make.com Enterprise (audit log) |
| SSO via Okta, Azure AD, or similar IDP required | Make.com Enterprise only |
| Client systems include Workday, ServiceNow, or Coupa | Make.com Enterprise only |
| Automation downtime from credit exhaustion is unacceptable | Make.com Enterprise (overage protection) |
| 10+ person team with client data processing agreements | Make.com Enterprise |
| High-volume operations where n8n self-hosted is viable | Skip Enterprise — n8n self-hosted at ~$15/mo VPS eliminates credit billing |
FAQ
What is the difference between Make.com Teams and Enterprise plans? Teams adds collaboration features: role-based access, shared scenario templates, and a team activity log. Enterprise adds governance and compliance infrastructure: SSO, SCIM user provisioning, audit logs, overage protection, 24/7 SLA-backed support, enterprise app integrations (Workday, ServiceNow), custom functions, and access to Make’s Value Engineering team. Teams and Enterprise share the same 10,000-credit base — the difference is entirely in governance and ecosystem access, not credit capacity.
Does Make.com Teams increase credit allocation over Pro? No. Core, Pro, and Teams all start at 10,000 credits per month. The same extra credit packs apply at the same $11/10,000 markup rate across all three plans. If credit volume is the primary upgrade driver, the correct evaluation is whether purchasing additional credit packs on Pro or Teams is more cost-effective than negotiating a custom Enterprise credit allocation.
When does Make.com Enterprise become necessary for an agency? Three specific triggers justify the Enterprise conversation: a compliance or audit requirement that demands forensic-level access logs; an SSO or SCIM mandate from the organization’s IT security policy; or integration with enterprise platforms (Workday, ServiceNow, Coupa, Greenhouse) unavailable on self-serve plans. For agencies without these requirements, Make.com Teams covers multi-person collaboration needs adequately.
Is Make.com Enterprise worth it at 5 people? Rarely on features alone. At 5 people, the collaboration layer of Teams covers the coordination needs. Enterprise becomes worth considering at 5 people only if overage protection is critical (high-volume, time-sensitive automations) or a compliance requirement mandates audit logs or SSO. Absent those conditions, Make.com Teams at $29/month is the correct ceiling for a 5-person ops team.
What happens when Make.com Teams exceeds its monthly credit limit? Scenarios pause immediately until credits are replenished: either by purchasing additional 10,000-credit packs at $11 each (with the 25% markup applied since November 2025) or by enabling auto-purchase in account settings. Make.com Enterprise is the only plan with overage protection that keeps scenarios running without a hard stop. Teams and all self-serve plans share the same pause-on-exhaustion behavior.
How does Make.com Teams pricing compare to n8n for a 5-person agency? Make.com Teams at $29/month plus credit packs for 40,000 credits runs approximately $62/month. n8n self-hosted on a 4GB Hetzner VPS costs approximately $7–15/month with no credit ceiling. The Make.com advantage is zero infrastructure management and 3,000+ maintained integrations. The n8n advantage is unlimited executions and full data residency control. For agencies with technical infrastructure capability, n8n self-hosted outperforms Teams on cost at volumes above 30,000 monthly credits.
